Biomarkers studied in patients with no OA, pre-radiographic OA, and fully developed OA
Dr. Cibere and colleagues studied 10 collagen-related biomarkers in a population-based cohort of patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of painful joints. These 201 subjects were classified into OA subgroups according to MRI-based cartilage score and Kellgren/Lawrence grades of radiographic severity. Subgroups were defined as:
- no OA: (MRC score 0, K/L grade <2)
- pre-radiographic OA (pre-ROA): MCR score ≥1, K/L grade <2)
- radiographic OA (ROA): MRC score ≥1, K/L grade ≥2
Analysis of urinary and serum biomarkers showed that the risk of ROA (versus no OA) increased with increasing levels of urinary CTX-II (C-telopeptide of type II collagen), urinary C2C (collagen cleavage neoepitope type II, and urinary C1,2C (types I and II collagen cleavage neoepitopes).
Radiographic OA risk was reduced in patients with high levels of sCPII (serum C-propeptide of type II procollagen).
Finally, patients with knee pain who had increasing levels of uC2C and uC1,2C were twice as likely to have pre-ROA as to have no OA. Ratios of collagen markers to collagen synthesis markers were even better at differentiating subjects with no OA from those with pre-ROA or ROA.
“Different cartilage degradation markers are associated with pre-ROA than are associated with ROA, indicating that their use as diagnostic markers depends on the stage of OA. Biomarker ratios contrasting cartilage degradation with cartilage synthesis are better able to differentiate OA stages compared with levels of the individual markers,” the authors write.
“Our study thus shows that different type II collagen degradation markers are associated with pre-ROA versus ROA. This will be important for future evaluation of biomarkers as diagnostic tools,” Dr. Cibere said.
Reference
1. Cibere J, Zhang H, Garnero P, et al. Association of biomarkers with pre-radiographically defined and radiographically defined knee osteoarthritis in a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1372-1380.